Home PoliticsShowunmi Blames North-Central’s Failure to Produce President on Disunity

Showunmi Blames North-Central’s Failure to Produce President on Disunity

by Torkuma Gbor
0 comments

Segun Showunmi, a member of the Presidential Campaign’s Media and Communications Community, attributed the North-Central’s inability to produce Nigeria’s elected president to disunity and a poor understanding of the country’s political dynamics.
‎
‎Mr Showunmi stated this while briefing journalists in Makurdi, stressing the need for unity of purpose, peaceful political engagement and sustained commitment to development.
‎
‎He said the region needed to mobilise substantial votes to strengthen its bargaining power and advance its presidential aspiration.
‎
‎According to him, Benue, with 3.05 million registered voters, can make a significant contribution to the region’s political ambitions if its electorate is effectively mobilised.
‎
‎“What has always been the challenge is, one, lack of unity among the people of North-Central; two, their inability to read the political arithmetic of power,” he said.
‎
‎Mr Showunmi, also the national convener of the Alternative Movement, argued that political power in a democracy is secured through votes and strategic negotiations, not military intervention.
‎
‎“If you have 3.05 million votes and you bring about three million or 2.5 million votes, what would then be the reason why they will sidestep you?” he asked.
‎
‎He urged the people of Benue to close ranks, avoid unnecessary political disagreements and work together to strengthen the state’s influence in national affairs.
‎
‎Mr Showunmi said the international community had increasingly focused attention on Benue because of the security challenges and humanitarian conditions affecting the state.
‎
‎He urged the region to use the attention to demonstrate its capacity for unity, effective leadership and constructive engagement.
‎
‎On the national economy, Mr Showunmi defended the Tinubu administration’s economic reforms, saying they were designed to address structural weaknesses in public finance.
‎
‎He acknowledged that the reforms had imposed hardship on citizens but argued that increased revenue available to the federal, state and local governments could stimulate economic activities.
‎
‎(NAN)
‎
‎

You may also like

Leave a Comment